Note: Beware of a website proclaiming to be New Tribal Ventures/An Ishmael Community! Do not reply to any request for information. Our legitimate pages are available on our site here & on the navigation to the left.

DQ on Facebook!Follow Us on

What's new
Daniel Quinn
Daniel Quinn's books
Schools & courses
Telephone Conferences
This website
New Tribal Ventures
Ishmael's Annex
Speaking Invitations

Visit Guestbook
Find others
Help us
Order books
Contact us
Telephone Conferences
Special Requests

Answers to Questions
DQ's suggested reading
DQ's Blog

The Ishmael Companion
Beyond Civilization
 Study Guide

  The Ishmael Community: Questions and Answers

Related Q&A(s): 576

The Question (ID Number 508)...

    I'm a student working on an assignment that requires using an "ethical decision making process" to suggest a possible resolution to an "ethical" dilemma. The case we've been presented with is that of a person who has had a neurological deficit and hasn't been improving as fast as the insurance company would like so the insurance company no longer wants to fund treatment. We're supposed to use an ethical decision making model to decide whether or not we should lie to the insurance company about progress to prolong treatment or find some alternative solution. Do you know of any resources for making "ethical" decisions that don't actually involve ethics or morals?

    ...and the response:

    I suspect you realize that if there were such a thing as you're looking for, you would have heard of it.

    Everyone supposedly knows the difference between right and wrong, but if this is the case, then why don't they know the answer to the question posed here? What is known is that the only way to "discover" what's right in this situation is to bring an action at court, argue it out, and then take a vote of jurors. If there is in fact a workable "ethical" decision-making model in existence, then why is it not used?

    Every tribal people knows how to handle conflicts like the one you describe ("has a workable decision-making model"), but I've never heard of a tribal people whose way of handling conflicts had anything to do with "ethics." In every tribe I know of, cases are handled on an individual basis (since no two are alike), along lines roughly consonant with game theory. Thus, what is sought is not the biggest win for any party but the least loss for all parties. (Game theory is notably not about ethics, but rather about desired and undesired outcomes; people do not in fact know right from wrong, but they do infallibly know what they want and don't want.)

    Related Q&A(s): 576

Go Back OR return to the Questions & Answers OR Browse to the Next Question
Site design and content, © 2018, Daniel Quinn