The Question (ID Number 169.)...
...and the response:Before talking about "solving" world hunger, you're going to have to tell me what world hunger IS. Here are some tests to begin with: How will you know when "world hunger" is "solved"? And how exactly have you determined that hunger is a thing that NEEDS to be "solved"? Hunger and satiety recur
cyclically throughout the community of life—daily, even hourly. If a creature feels hunger is this some kind of "problem"? Does "solving" world hunger mean "eliminating" hunger? This, to me, is simply meaningless. You say that "one view" is that population growth is "more in the hands of
family planning organizations." This isn't just "one view," this is the dominant view of our culture. To say that world grain outputs have not "drastically" increased in recent years misses the point. The point is that they have increased SUFFICIENTLY to keep the world population growing catastrophically.
If you've read my books, you'll know that I haven't talked about "alleviating world hunger." This is partly because I don't know what "world hunger" is. Whatever it is, it's not threatening to make our planet
uninhabitable to our own species (and many others). On the other hand, our population explosion IS threatening to make our planet uninhabitable---and
this is where my attention is focused.
Go Back OR return to the Questions & Answers OR Browse to the Next Question
| Site design and content © 2018, Daniel Quinn|