I’m fully aware that Mother Culture doesn’t agree with the point that I’m making. I’m not denying the existence or the importance of free will.
What I’m pointing out and will continue to point out is that we had free will last year and our population grew by 2%, we had free will the year before that and our population grew by 2%, we had free will the year before that and our population grew by 2%, we had free will the year before that and our population grew by 2%, we had free will the year before that and our population grew by 2%, we had free will the year before that and our population grew by 2%, we had free will the year before that and our population grew by 2%, we had free will the year before that and our population grew by 2%, we had free will the year before that and our population grew by 2%, we had free will the year before that and our population grew by 2%, we had free will the year before that and our population grew by 2%, we had free will the year before that and our population grew by 2%, we had free will the year before that and our population grew by 2%, we had free will the year before that and our population grew by 2%, we had free will the year before that and our population grew by 2% (and so on, for as far back as you’d care to go).
I’m also pointing of that we have free will this year and our population will grow by 2%, and I see utterly no reason to doubt that (under the rubric of free will) our population will grow by 2% next year and the year after that and the year after that and the year after that and the year after that and the year after that and the year after that and the year after that and the year after that and the year after that and the year after that———–UNLESS we STOP expecting free will to end this catastrophe and make a SYSTEMIC change.
ID: 413
posted: 06 Jun 1999
updated: 06 Jun 1999