The notion that rich and poor will join hands to create a new social and economic order for humanity is utopianism at its worst, and waiting for it to happen sheer folly. The question I raise in Beyond Civilization is, at base, why should there be one and only one socio-economic system for the whole of humanity? To suppose that there can only be one such system, to which all must adhere, is rather like supposing that there should be only one ideal game that everyone should play or only one ideal sport in which everyone should engage or one ideal vehicle that everyone should travel in.
You’re quite right to be in despair if you expect the whole of the present world order to vanish and be replaced root and branch by a new one. You may as well put your faith in the preposterous idea that humanity is (within the next fifty years!) going to evolve to a higher state of being. If the world is going to change (and we have no guarantee that it IS going to change), we must be content to change it INCREMENTALLY rather than comprehensively.
The present world order was built not by people sitting down and working it out in a great council but by people pursuing their self-interests, their own desire to attain a good a life (incrementally). If the world is going to change, we must (as I’ve tried to do in my own writing) try to point people in a new direction in which to realize their self-interests (incrementally). This is what the New Tribal Revolution is about: not expecting people to embrace a poor life but showing them another way to attain a good life–a way that worked for humans for millions of years.
Related Q&A(s): 377 380 392 403 406 448 452 456 461 471 473 474 481 483 494 496 500 501 505 509 513 516 539 540 546 547 548 549 550
posted: 13 Aug 2000
updated: 01 Apr 2002