With regard to population, when the 6 billionth person was born, one of the writers for National Review tried to put this into perspective and reveled that if all 6 billion people lived in the state of Texas, each of them would have an eighth of an acre to him/herself. This doesn’t seem like too many people to me. Any comments?

Yes, but how are the strategies proposed in Beyond Civilization supposed to eliminate pollution, overpopulation, crime, teenage pregnancy, substance abuse, poverty, police brutality, political corruption, racism, child abuse, violence against women, homophobia, pornography, violence in film and music, exploitation of the elderly, date rape, judicial malfeasance, insider trading, road rage, and media bias?

Ishmael says that to feed a starving people will only perpetuate their suffering, and I agree. However, Ishmael also offered as a solution “moving the starving people out, to a place where food is more abundant.” Beg your pardon, but unless I misread what you are saying, I cannot possibly understand this logic. What is the difference between sending food to the people, and sending people to the food? Is the result not the same? Would they not simply multiply in the area to whence they were moved, and eventually exhaust all those resources, as well?

But what about democracy? We are all raised to believe that democracy is a huge achievement of man, that it is a much more benign and enlightened form or government, that it represents another step in the inevitable upward evolution from the desperate ‘brutish, mean, and short’ life of primitive man toward civilization and then democracy. But I have started to question this. Democracy evolved out the taker totalitarian states that lock up the food, and democracy locks up the food even more effectively than totalitarian states do. It seems that once the totalitarian state had trained everyone to believe that life consisted of ‘death and taxes’, distributed totalitarianism, or capitalism, was a much more effective way to increase the surplus produced each year. Democracy made the life of the peasant worse. Under totalitarianism, at least you only had one despot to please. Now, you have a multitude of despots competing to produce the most surplus on your back.

Go to Top